Bitcoin may be the change we are all waiting for!



Many new ideas are ambitious when they are formed; But when the time comes, these same ideas become commonplace. Bitcoin is no exception. For example, if such an idea had been proposed in 2000, few might have accepted it; But now we see that the idea of ​​bitcoin has been realized and received wide recognition.

Bitcoin is revolutionizing the world economy. The creation of a decentralized monetary system without government intervention, trade directly and with high security are some of the changes that bitcoin has brought.

The article, published on the Bitcoin Magazine website, is a note by Joachim Buk, a researcher at the American Institute for Economic Research. In this article, Bock examines the problems facing humanity today and sees the root of them all in wrong choices, seeking quick solutions, superficiality and attention to the appearance of things, instead of focusing on real change.

He goes on to mention bitcoin as a phenomenon that can help us make these important and significant changes. What you read below is from the author of this note.

Change the name of Bitcoin

Bitcoin may be the change we are all waiting for!

We live in a false world in which all ideals, currencies and languages ​​are imaginary. A world full of deceptive strategies and wrong methods that can be used to make money fast. Where you don’t have to work hard to succeed. In this empty world, it is enough to hide all the flaws. We hide everything that is not as good as what we see in the movies and try to show off in front of others with stylish clothes and masks. We will continue this false process until we convince ourselves and others that we are not corrupt from within and that we are even growing and advancing.

Many of us get our investment advice from video tickets. We buy GameStop options and pray for a miracle to happen. In moments of failure, instead of identifying the root problem and taking responsibility for our choices, we complain about the injustice of the capitalist system.

In appearance, we use solar panels and wind turbines in deserts, plains and ocean shores; But we are surprised by the frequent interruptions and the figures of the electricity bills. However, governments and conservationists tell us that these energies are clean and that our subsidies are in the direction of developing these technologies. So such an approach is natural IN Appearance Looks good.

If a strange virus spreads rapidly around the world, we will sharply criticize the inefficiency of governments and planners around the world. However, we do not allow people to take responsibility for their health and we do not encourage them to eat better, exercise more and exercise. Instead, we lock them up in their homes; When the disease spreads much easier among other family members and at the same time they can not get the vitamin D they need to fight the disease naturally. We pretend that the solution to this problem is rapid and severe medical intervention; There is a consolidated solution that does not include tips for maintaining a healthy body and immune system.

We can only pretend that we can solve the world’s problems by creating a centralized system for planning and temporarily relieving pain.

The world can be changed

Bitcoin may be the change we are all waiting for!

I have had a lot of experience meeting such writers in my career. A few years ago, the editors of the Guardian, Britain’s leading left-wing publication, decided to change the term climate change to “Climate Emergency” or “Climate Crisis”; An event that many readers of this magazine around the world admired.

Earlier this year, I learned that the Financial Times followed in the footsteps of the Guardian, either voluntarily or under pressure from colleagues. In a recent article criticizing the high energy consumption of bitcoin, the phrase was included in the text of the article:

There must be no compromise between the democratization of finances and meteorological emergencies.

It seems that the use of powerful words can affect the main subject more! This is not the first time this has happened. The magazine’s editorial board used such terms at least twice last year. It is interesting to note that until a few years ago, the Financial Times used more conventional language to discuss various issues and climate change.

I could never understand the reason for this obsession and play on words. Are these really the words of this group of journalists who are preventing the world from pursuing aggressive climate policies and at the same time what the intellectual class is desperately longing for?

A similar thing happened last year for ethnicity. A number of activists in the midst of racial war have called on news outlets to capitalize the word “black” instead of physically describing blacks to indicate that they are an ethnic group with a common heritage. This problem continued until the protests against the death of George Floyd, and the dispute was institutionalized by the New York Times, in order to honor the historical victims of black Americans and to spell the word Black in capital letters B.

The Associated Press, on the other hand, which is the source of many publications, entered directly into cultural debates in a similar situation, refusing to write the word White with a capital letter W. The statement said:

Because whites have less common history and culture, White’s phrase does not deserve to be popularized and capitalized W.

I do not pay attention to the change of writing styles. I make a living by editing newsletters, quarterly reports, and presenting academic journals. Most publications use different styles and formats. Some people write titles in capital letters and others do not. Some write the full name, while others rely on the initials of the words. One group follows a specific mechanism for letters and numbers, but another does not.

These decentralized and emerging methods are very similar to the topic of language. Everyone has their own ideas and opinions in this area. Last year, on the annual celebration of the influence of blacks in American history, I advised one of my clients to use this new spelling method adopted by some publications; Since his article was specifically about the repression of black writers in the media and education, this spelling could make the subject more tangible.

Spelling patterns, gender neutrals, or other superficial labels are not issues that bother me. They just make it look better and it swirls. What really worries me, and there is no end to it, are the elite elites who are replacing wrongdoing with real and meaningful change.

If you really believe in the importance of your goal, you need to do something about it, instead of playing with words or presenting seemingly accurate news. If people are interested in your writing, it’s because of the content of your article, not because of the spelling method you choose. Although British spelling or punctuation is often uncommon for American audiences, this does not diminish the importance and status of celebrities such as Churchill or Orwell in their articles.

When it comes to Orwell, it seems that a group of journalists have accepted the misconception that Orwell has sharply criticized in his article “Politics and the English Language”.

Instead of covering the facts with correct interpretations, the authors exaggerate the expression of concepts to the point that they mentally numb readers.

If our current situation, according to these journalists, is critical, then how do they interpret the situation and the reasons why these crises are intensifying? If inequalities can only be removed by moving the author’s pen, then why don’t we live in a paradise of justice and abundance?

Do we really think that deep hatred of race, gender, or sexual orientation of others can be cured by changing the way we write articles? Before we can persuade and distance ourselves from these people, we will probably provoke resentment and division among the people.

Stephen Pinker, a professor at Harvard University, in his book Whiteboard: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature), who writes about the process of changing interpretations, points out that concepts are formed in the human mind from the beginning; No words.

If you change the name of something, the new word inherits the meaning of the previous word; But if you give the concept a new name, its name becomes the color of its meaning.

In recent decades, I have witnessed the term cleaner become a caretaker, employee, security guard and then site manager, and I think the term will soon change to executive director of garbage collection!

Changing people’s names does not change the nature of the work they do.

16th-century politician, writer and lawyer Thomas More says:

Some people believe that the earth is flat, others say it is round. If the land is flat, can the state parliament declare it round? And if it is round, can the king’s order equal it ?!

If we replace the rulers with journalists, and the earth with the problems that exist today, we will see that what Thomas said can be transmitted and applied to society five centuries later.

Instead of striving for greatness, prosperity or a secure life, we combine our deceptive ideals with quick fixes. We portray a glorious life on Instagram and express our feelings with jealousy for the latest edited photo of our friend from the coast of Greece or Bali, Indonesia.

We feel restful in our sleep with watery TV series or some of Netflix’s often addictive shows; But we have nothing to do with the treasure trove of literature, human communication and the beautiful sunset.

Once the effect of moments of pleasure and happiness passes for us, we turn to drugs or antidepressants that we believe will save us from the abyss. If we suffer from high blood pressure or type 2 diabetes, we believe that we should switch to expensive drugs instead of exercising, eliminating carbohydrates and following a proper diet.

The suffering we suffer for all these false things hinders us from work and activities that can improve our lives; Good job to make money, exercise to stay healthy.

Yes, and bitcoin is not for me. But instead, bitcoin offers a demonstration of correctness, truth, and a refusal to accept nonsense.

Bitcoin forces its users to take responsibility for life and finances, to look away from the immediate pain of future achievements and to make significant changes instead of external changes.

No problem, no matter how much you want to fight semantic, literary, political and medical battles; But don’t pretend that these actions bring your ideals a little closer to reality. Cross-sectoral decisions do not fix the world of drowning.

Conclusion

Bitcoin is a phenomenon whose idea, like many other technologies, may seem ambitious at first; But now he has made many changes in the world economic system. The creation of an equal monetary system with a decentralized, uncontrolled character, direct intermediation and high security are the changes that bitcoin has brought with it.

Bitcoin is a revolution that not only revolutionizes finance, but can be the source of many other important changes in the world. There are obviously several problems that Bitcoin cannot solve; But with its unique features, it puts consumers on the path to taking responsibility for their lives and choices and focusing on fundamental and meaningful change to solve problems instead of focusing on appearance.

Post Bitcoin may be the change we are all waiting for! appeared first for currency.

Leave Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Supportscreen tag